175
why
the
opium referred to should not
be handed
over to the plaintiffs in
satisfaction of the decrces wade in
their
favor.
To the service of these orders
aud quIN MONACO
objecti
the
Dr. Von Mollendorff.
grounds, if I understand
hive aright, that they refer to property
which being
in the custody of the Coneulate is exceder the control of
the German
Government, and that therefore,
British Overt has no
3.
In
a
• jurisdiction.
consequence of the advice
given by the Altonay Gournal, whose
opinion will be found amongst the
correspondence
correspondence, I diaceted that the afating Geanum Convul should be informed
that I was not aware
international usage.
of any law or
under which he
the
could claim exccuption froue
ordinary process of the Court. That
he had any good cause to show
if he
the orders
of the Court should be set
why
aside, it was a question with which
I was unable to deal, and which could
only be raised
by
him before the
Supreme Court in the proper way,
The writs were
to him on
overe accor
accordingly
16th instant.
returned
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.